Asia Press Agency

Tag: Ram Temple Inauguration

  • Asaduddin Owaisi Asserts Babri Masjid Systematically Snatched

    Asaduddin Owaisi Asserts Babri Masjid Systematically Snatched

    Amidst the impending inauguration of the Ram temple in Ayodhya, AIMIM chief Asaduddin Owaisi has voiced strong sentiments, stating that the Babri Masjid was “very systematically snatched” from the Muslim community. Owaisi questioned historical events, alleging that the sequence of incidents, including the placement of idols and the demolition of the mosque, led to the current situation. His remarks come as a backdrop to the politically charged atmosphere surrounding the inauguration of the “historic” Ram temple.

     

    Owaisi’s Statements and Historical Events:

    Asaduddin Owaisi highlighted three significant historical incidents contributing to the present circumstances. He referenced the placement of idols inside the Babri Masjid during Congress’s GB Pant’s chief ministership in the 1950s, the opening of locks in 1986, and the demolition of the mosque on December 6, 1992, which he attributed to the BJP and the Sangh Parivar.

     

    Questioning Historical Choices:

    Owaisi posed critical questions, asking whether the situation would be different today if certain actions were not taken in the past. He specifically mentioned the possibility of a different outcome if the idols had been removed in the 1950s or if the locks had not been opened in 1986. Owaisi raised these questions, asserting that they remain unanswered.

     

    Criticism of Other Political Parties:

    Owaisi criticized other political parties, including Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal’s announcement of organizing religious events in government schools. He accused these parties of targeting the majority community’s votes, alleging a lack of scrutiny on such actions. Owaisi’s remarks emphasized his perspective on the political dynamics surrounding the Ram temple inauguration and its potential impact on communal sentiments.

     

    Controversy and BJP’s Response:

    Owaisi’s recent remarks advising Muslim youths to stay alert against attempts to “snatch away” mosques had previously triggered controversy, with the BJP accusing him of “communalising” the consecration of the Ram temple in Ayodhya. The political tension surrounding the temple inauguration has further fueled the exchange of statements between different political factions.

     

    Upcoming Ram Temple Inauguration:

    The ‘Pran Pratishtha’ of Shri Ram Lalla is scheduled for January 22, marking a significant step in the Ram temple’s inauguration process. The ceremony holds immense cultural and religious significance, with the idol sculpted by Arun Yogiraj taking its place inside the Sanctum Santorum.

     

    As the countdown to the Ram temple inauguration continues, Asaduddin Owaisi’s statements underscore the deep-rooted sentiments and historical grievances associated with the Babri Masjid. The questioning of past choices and criticism of political maneuvers highlight the complex interplay of history, religion, and politics in the lead-up to this historic event. The statements also reflect the broader socio-political landscape, where differing perspectives converge, contributing to an atmosphere charged with emotion and historical resonance.

  • NCP MLA Jitendra Awhad Apologizes for Controversial Remark

    NCP MLA Jitendra Awhad Apologizes for Controversial Remark

    NCP MLA Jitendra Awhad finds himself at the center of a controversy as he tenders an apology for his recent comment on Lord Ram’s dietary habits, a statement that has ignited a significant uproar. The remark, asserting that “Lord Ram was a non-vegetarian,” has faced criticism from various quarters, including right-wing groups and devotees, especially with the approaching inauguration of the Ram temple in Ayodhya on January 22.

     

    The controversy has escalated to the point where legal action is being sought against the MLA Jitendra Awhad by individuals who claim that his statement has hurt religious sentiments. Simultaneously, protests have erupted on the streets, as many express their displeasure with Awhad’s comments.

     

    Attempting to justify his stance, Jitendra Awhad, during a press conference in Mumbai, stated, “Look, I am telling you I did not bring my own interpretation or views into it. I did not incorporate any ideas of my own. I based my opinion on whatever is written in Valmiki Ramayana.” He emphasized that his words were rooted in the ancient text and not influenced by personal biases.

     

    Expressing regret for any offense caused, Awhad remarked, “I do express regret if my words offended someone’s feelings. I did not wish to hurt anyone’s sentiments,” as quoted by news agency ANI.

     

    Awhad further defended his position by citing an “authentic version” of the Ramayana, claiming it was written 1,800 years ago and published in Kolkata in 1891. He asserted that IIT Kanpur had even published a research paper on this version, asserting the credibility of his source.

     

    Refuting allegations of misinterpretation, Awhad outlined the six khands (chapters) of the Valmiki Ramayana, namely Balakand, Ayodhyakand, Aranyakand, Kishkindakhand, Sunderkand, and Yudhkand. He urged critics to refer to the scripture, particularly the 120th verse of the Ayodhya khand, to comprehend the basis of his remarks.

     

    In his controversial statement, Awhad had claimed, “Lord Ram belongs to us, Bahujans. He used to hunt and eat animals. He is a Bahujan.” This assertion sparked a fierce reaction, with Awhad contending that Lord Ram, during his 14 years in exile in the forest, was a non-vegetarian, challenging the prevailing perception of him as a vegetarian.

     

    The controversy has not been limited to verbal exchanges, as the Ajit Pawar faction of the NCP protested outside Awhad’s Mumbai residence, denouncing his remarks. BJP MLA Ram Kadam, leading the protest, returned with a poster of Awhad, symbolically hitting it with slippers. Kadam has also lodged a complaint with the police against the NCP leader.

     

    Kadam expressed, “It is their mindset to hurt the sentiments of the Ram bhakts. However, we won’t tolerate it if they make fun of our Sanatan Dharm for votes. The realization of a grand Ram Temple in Ayodhya doesn’t seem to have gone down well with the ghamandiya (arrogant) alliance,” as reported by ANI.

     

    As the controversy unfolds, it remains to be seen how Awhad’s apology and the subsequent developments will impact the political and religious landscape surrounding the Ram temple inauguration in Ayodhya.