Asia Press Agency

Tag: NewsClick

  • Journalists Protest Delhi Police Crackdown on NewsClick

    Journalists Protest Delhi Police Crackdown on NewsClick

    Journalists from across India have taken to the streets to protest against the recent Delhi Police crackdown on NewsClick, a news portal. The journalists, along with prominent media groups, have also jointly written a letter to Chief Justice DY Chandrachud, urging the Supreme Court to take “cognisance and intervene” in the matter. The protests and the letter come in response to the arrest of NewsClick’s founder, Prabir Purkayastha, and its HR head, Amit Chakravarty, following raids at more than 50 locations. The case against them has been filed under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA), an anti-terror law.

     

    In the joint letter, the media organizations and press clubs express their concerns about the state of journalism in India and the threats faced by journalists. They emphasize that many journalists in the country are currently working under the threat of reprisal. The letter also underscores the importance of the judiciary in upholding the principles of democracy and the constitution.

     

    The letter outlines the events leading up to the arrests, including the raids on NewsClick’s offices and the seizure of digital devices and documents. It raises serious questions about the use of the UAPA in this case, describing it as “especially chilling.” The media groups argue that journalism cannot and should not be equated with terrorism.

     

    One of the central points made in the letter is the impact of intimidation and legal action against the media on the democratic fabric of society. The letter suggests that subjecting journalists to a criminal process because the government disapproves of their coverage is an attempt to suppress the press through the threat of reprisal, which goes against the principles of press freedom.

     

    The media organizations put forth several recommendations for the judiciary to consider. These recommendations include the framing of norms to discourage the arbitrary seizure of journalists’ phones and laptops, as well as guidelines for the interrogation of journalists. The goal is to protect the rights and freedoms of journalists and ensure that their work can continue without fear of reprisal or intimidation.

     

    The joint letter and the protests by journalists highlight the growing concerns about press freedom in India. The use of anti-terror laws against journalists and media organizations has raised alarm bells among press associations and civil society groups. The role of the judiciary in safeguarding press freedom and upholding democratic values is seen as crucial in addressing these concerns.

     

    The case against NewsClick and its employees is likely to be closely watched as it unfolds, with implications for the state of journalism and media freedom in India. Journalists and media organizations continue to advocate for the protection of their rights and the principles of a free and independent press.

  • Police Raid NewsClick Offices Over Alleged Foreign Funds

    Police Raid NewsClick Offices Over Alleged Foreign Funds

    In a significant development, the Delhi Police conducted raids on the offices of news media company NewsClick and the residences of its journalists, sparking controversy and concerns over press freedom in India. The raids were part of an ongoing investigation into the news outlet’s alleged receipt of foreign funds, particularly from China.

     

    Background on NewsClick:

    NewsClick, founded in 2009, has gained a reputation as one of India’s few independent news outlets willing to critique Prime Minister Narendra Modi and his political ideology.

     

    Raids by Delhi Police:

    The Delhi Police initiated these raids on NewsClick’s premises and journalists’ homes following information provided by the Enforcement Directorate. In total, 24 locations across the national capital, including Delhi, Noida, Ghaziabad, Gurugram, and Mumbai, were targeted in the operation.

     

    Electronic devices such as mobile phones and laptops were confiscated during the raids, and five journalists were taken in for further questioning. Among the journalists questioned were prominent figures like Urmilesh and Abhisar Sharma.

     

    Reactions and Criticism:

    The raids have prompted widespread criticism, with many viewing them as an attack on one of India’s few remaining independent news outlets. Opposition blocs, including INDIA (Indian National Developmental Inclusive Alliance), strongly condemned the actions of the Delhi Police.

     

    Critics argue that the Indian government’s actions, including the raids on NewsClick, are directed against those who dare to speak truth to power, while divisive rhetoric and hate speech often go unpunished. There are concerns that such actions may undermine press freedom and stifle critical voices in the country.

     

    Allegations and Denials:

    NewsClick has been under scrutiny since August, following allegations that it received funds from an American millionaire. These allegations were highlighted in a New York Times report that accused the website of spreading “Chinese propaganda.” NewsClick vehemently denied these charges.

     

    The case against NewsClick was filed under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, an anti-terrorism law that has been criticized for its broad scope and potential for misuse against activists, journalists, and government critics.

     

    As of now, no arrests have been made in connection with the investigation into NewsClick.

     

    Concerns for Press Freedom:

    The raid on NewsClick comes amid growing concerns about the erosion of press freedom in India. Several news organizations have faced investigations for financial impropriety under the Modi government, and international observers have raised alarms about the state of media freedom in the country.

     

    The incident underscores the delicate balance between legitimate investigations and safeguarding the fundamental principles of press freedom and free speech in a democratic society.