Asia Press Agency

Tag: Bandh

  • Section 144 Imposed in Karnataka’s Mandya District

    Section 144 Imposed in Karnataka’s Mandya District

    In response to a bandh called by pro-Kannada organizations, farmer unions, and several other groups regarding the contentious Cauvery water issue, the district administration of Mandya in Karnataka has imposed Section 144 on September 28. This decision was announced by Mandya DC Dr. Kumar, who stated, “In view of the bandh called by pro-Kannada organizations, farmer unions, and several other organizations tomorrow regarding Cauvery water issue, Section 144 has been imposed in Mandya district, and schools and colleges will remain closed tomorrow.”

     

    The call for the statewide bandh on September 29 was initially made following the successful Bengaluru shutdown organized by the ‘Karnataka Jala Samrakshana Samiti,’ an umbrella outfit of farmers’ associations and other organizations led by farmer leader Kuruburu Shanthakumar. This move gained momentum when ‘Kannada Okkuta,’ led by Kannada activist Vatal Nagaraj, also announced its support for the bandh.

     

    It is noteworthy that both groups are advocating for the same cause, which is related to the release of Cauvery river water to Tamil Nadu. However, Vatal Nagaraj clarified that the bandh he called for was not limited to Bengaluru but aimed to be an “Akhanda Karnataka bandh” (entire Karnataka bandh) on September 29, encompassing all districts. He emphasized that their fight was for the entire state of Karnataka, and Kannada Okkuta had previously organized more than 50 bandhs across the state.

     

    Karnataka Chief Minister Siddaramaiah confirmed that the government would not curtail the “Bengaluru bandh” organized by some farmers’ organizations on September 28. He urged for the maintenance of peace during these protests and affirmed that his government would present its case more forcefully before the Supreme Court regarding the release of Cauvery River water to Tamil Nadu.

     

    Siddaramaiah further highlighted that Karnataka would challenge the directive of the Cauvery Water Regulation Committee (CWRC) to release water to Tamil Nadu in the Supreme Court. The ongoing protests in Karnataka stem from a September 21 Supreme Court order mandating Karnataka to release 5,000 cusecs of water to Tamil Nadu daily.

     

    Officials in Karnataka have pointed out that the state is facing a severe water shortage due to a shortfall in cumulative inflows to its four reservoirs in the Cauvery basin, which hold only 53.04 percent of their capacity. The situation has been exacerbated by a deficient southwest monsoon and historically low rainfall in August and September, making it difficult for the state to meet even its drinking water requirements.

     

    The Cauvery water dispute remains a longstanding issue between Karnataka and Tamil Nadu, and the recent developments reflect the ongoing tensions and protests surrounding this sensitive matter.

  • Siddaramaiah Addresses Cauvery Water Dispute Amid Protests

    Siddaramaiah Addresses Cauvery Water Dispute Amid Protests

    In the southern Indian state of Karnataka, the longstanding Cauvery water dispute has once again flared up, triggering protests, and raising concerns about the potential for violence. Karnataka Chief Minister Siddaramaiah recently announced that his government would not interfere with a “Bengaluru bandh” called by certain farmers’ organizations in response to the release of Cauvery river water to neighboring Tamil Nadu. The protests have gained momentum in recent days, with tensions running high in the region.

     

    The Cauvery river, which flows through both Karnataka and Tamil Nadu, has been a source of contention between the two states for decades. Disputes over the sharing of Cauvery’s waters have often led to conflicts and legal battles. The Supreme Court has periodically issued directives to allocate water resources between the two states, but these decisions have not always satisfied either side.

     

    Siddaramaiah’s decision not to curtail the protests is rooted in the principles of democracy, where the right to peaceful protest is protected. However, it comes with a stern reminder to maintain peace and ensure the safety of all citizens. He also reiterated his government’s commitment to present a robust argument before the Supreme Court when the Cauvery water dispute comes up for its next hearing. This legal battle is crucial for Karnataka as it seeks to safeguard its own interests amidst concerns of water scarcity due to inadequate monsoon rains.

     

    The Karnataka government’s legal battle stems from its objections to the orders of the Cauvery Water Management Authority and Regulation Committee, which mandated the release of 5,000 cusecs of water to Tamil Nadu for 15 days starting from September 13. Karnataka contended that it could not afford to release this volume of water due to its own pressing needs, including providing drinking water and irrigation for crops in the Cauvery basin areas. The state’s claim was, however, rejected by the Supreme Court.

     

    Meanwhile, political parties, including the opposition, have sought to exploit the situation for their own gain. Siddaramaiah accused the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and Janata Dal (Secular) of engaging in political maneuvering over the issue. In a democracy, such protests cannot be curtailed, but the political rhetoric surrounding them remains a cause for concern.

     

    The situation is further complicated by the call for a statewide bandh on September 29 by various Kannada outfits, led by Kannada activists Vatal Nagaraj. Bandhs are a form of protest that can disrupt daily life and commerce, potentially leading to further tensions and clashes.

     

    Deputy Chief Minister D.K. Shivakumar acknowledged the delicate balance the government must strike. While respecting the democratic right to protest, he also stressed the importance of understanding court orders and avoiding actions that could have legal repercussions.

     

    The Cauvery water dispute is a longstanding and deeply entrenched issue that requires a careful and balanced approach. Karnataka, Tamil Nadu, and the Indian Supreme Court must all work together to find a sustainable solution that addresses the water needs of both states while preventing further unrest and disruption. In the meantime, Siddaramaiah’s government remains committed to protecting Karnataka’s interests and presenting its case forcefully before the court, all while urging for peace and restraint among the citizens.